I think the papers about slurs made me consider language
differently more than naming conventions. I have always known that slurs were
offensive but I haven’t considered why or for what reasons. My base idea was
that they didn’t show respect toward the people they referred to (which is also
the case), but through these last few papers I found that there was more to
slurs than I originally thought. Interesting cases like quotations exist which
seem to prove that slurs have a separate linguistic category than other words
since despite a supposed neutral aspect, still invoke a reaction. They are also
a category of words which seem to have a sense of uselessness (unwarranted
perhaps is a better term) to them, which also makes them unique. In short, slurs
are more complicated than I thought and these papers have shown me that.
No comments:
Post a Comment